I ran across a fantastic article online about the history of chorus girls in London. I'll highlight a few specific interesting facts here:
- Many women heard stories of chorus girls working on stage and finding rich socialite husbands, allowing them to retire to a life of luxury, and this, of course, made the idea of becoming a chorus girl attractive. For most, however, it was a life of hard work, many privations, and very little glamour.
- The pay being offered for chorus girls fell as the competition for places increased, since managers could then pick and choose and could get all the girls they needed at the meagrest of wages. Soon, only the prettiest and most talented could find regular work at all, and then it was a life of hard work and plenty of it. For most of those who persevered it would be not so much a life as an existence, a daily hand-to-mouth struggle to get by.
- Even when they had a paid gig lined up, their pay would not begin until the show opened to the public, and there
Dancers getting their talents measured for a
spot in the Theatre Revue on Broadway, 1937
- Between engagements, some might be lucky enough to earn a few extra shillings posing for photographic portraits or find some other work to help them get by. For others it was no uncommon thing to pawn their few possessions, everything except their clothes in fact, in order to pay for food and lodging.
- The pay was hard labour. In any given production it would be the chorus girl who did three-quarters of all the labor, whilst the named actors and actresses garnered nine tenths of all the money.
- One girl might commonly make five or six changes of costume in an evening, and figure in ten or a dozen numbers in which she did more work than the man or woman who sang the song.
- Chorus girls had to provide all her own tights and dancing shoes out of her own slender stipend.